Thursday, September 24, 2009
Animal Communcication
One would believe that animals have a way of communicating based on sound. When in reality these sounds are the lack of language because of displacement, arbitrariness and productivity.
Quotes
“when your dog says Grrr, it means Grrr, right now,because dogs don't seem capable of communicating Grrr,last night, over in the park. In contrast, human language users are normally capable of producing messages equivalent to Grr, last night, over in the park, and then going to say In fact, I'll be going back tomorrow for some more."(pg.9)
- This quote describes what displacement is all about. Displacement is the property of human language to refer to the past and future time. For example in this quote even though a dog says Grr, he is not describing I want to go to the park today or tomorrow because they are not capable if accomplishing such a task.
"For the majority if animal signals, there does not appear to be a clear connection between the conveyed message and the signal used to convey it. This impression we have of the non-arbitrariness of the animal signaling may be closely connected to the fact that, for any animal, the set of signals used in communication is finite. That is, each variety of animal communication consists of a fixed and limited set of vocal or gesture forms."(pg.10)
-This quote describes what arbitrariness is in relation to animal communication. It declares that even though just like human language their sounds do not directly correlate with what they sound like. They are not communicating through language because they are limited in their vocal capability.
“Productivity (or creativity or openendness) and it is linked to the fact that the potential number if utterances in my human language is infinite. The communications systems of other creatures do not appear to have this type of flexibility. Cicadas have four signals to choose from and vervet monkeys have thirty-six vocal calls."
Should There be an Authority on Language in America?
The United States of America does not have an official language, therefore there is no need of an authority to govern one. It would be unfair to have an authority because it would force people to conform, possibly losing their culture, it would make America look hypocritical as she calls herself a melting pot of nations, and it would take away from the diversity of the nation.
“Today, english is governed by a loose network of “language authorities,”; English teachers, editors, journalists, columnists on language, and authors/editors of dictionaries, grammar and usage books, and style guides.”
This could be a useful quote because it gives examples of the current “authorities” of language. Though they’re not official, we give them the authority they have.
"I remember coming home and my grandma asked me to talk Indian to her and I said, 'Grandma, I don't understand you,' " Wright says. "She said, 'Then who are you?' "- Bill Wright This is useful because it shows first hand the negative experiences of trying to embrace an authority of language, such is the case in the mid 20th century when Americans tried to force Native Americans to learn English and lose their culture.
“...however, he seems to have realized that English would change despite efforts to keep it stable.” This quote would be useful as in introductory to discussing the melting pot of cultures. It helps explain the effects of such a large diversity of culture, leading to a constant changing of the English language. This would mean an authority would be useless if the language is changing that often.
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Blog 4 OED vs UD:Bad
Composition 1101
Dr. Hughes
Blog 4
OED vs UD: “Bad”
Composition 1101 is bad! This phrase describes in urban slang my perspective of the class, Composition 1101. I find it challenging and am definitely enjoying the experience of learning the different styles of writing. My class, Composition 1101 is bad, is a phrase that means the opposite in the prescriptive definition of the Oxford English Dictionary. This definition, of course is not my perspective however I prefer this definition as I am a very traditional person. The scholars who authorized the linguistic terms defined in the OED base their professional opinions on the long standing custom or usage of the words they define. They are defining the normal standard of use over many, sometimes hundreds of years. Therefore, their definitions are particularly in the prescriptive form. “Bad” meaning: “not achieving an adequate standard”, “evil”, “sinful”, “vulgar” or “obscene”. The OED is the “Gold Standard” of defining the English Language.
In comparison to the OED, the Urban Dictionary is a slang, modern, and descriptive source for terms and its definition. “Bad” meaning: “good”, “great”, “a lot” or “good looking or attractive wanted by many”. Such as, “I love you so bad!” and “she is bad!”
This reference claims its origin or use is derived from “Black English”. Its use is slang and the authority is known and unknown as it is posted by viewpoints of anyone who cares to submit their ideas of American Slang. Both the OED and the UD compose its definition as an adjective.
The references, OED and UD are equally accurate today, according to the use of language and the intent of its user. However, I prefer the OED as the standard reference for the English Language when needed for articulating standard, formal English. Although, the UD is informative and useful in today’s environment such as how language is currently used on the internet, informal writing, and communication. These “everyday”, “slang” uses are an important part of our society and culture as we become more “mosaic” or “blended” as an American, English speaking nation. It is important to relate to those around you whether you prefer one form of speech to another, so that you can clearly understand what message it is that someone is communicating to you be it written or spoken.
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Blog Prompt for Friday, Sept. 25
This week for your blog you will be preparing to write your first formal paper. Here is what you need to do.
The title of your blog should be your topic. That is, in the "Title" block should be something like: "Learning Langauge: Biological or Cultural?," "Defining Animal and Human Communication," or "Language Authority in the United States."
Write your thesis statement/s. Remember that it should be CLEAR, PRECISE, and DEBATABLE. As discussed, sometimes, a thesis "statement" can be more than one sentence.
Record and cite (author, page number!) three quotes from the reading that you think you could use as material to establish credibility, as evidence for your argument, or as a counterargument that you will address.
After each quote, explain in a few sentences what the quote means and how you plan on using it in the essay (credibility, evidence, counterargument).
I will not be checking the length of your blog, but this is not an invitation to slack off. Your explanations of the quotes will take some effort! I will be grading you on how well you followed directions, and how well you pulled the material together as the basis of your paper. Your writing should be in formal Standard English -- I will mark down for poor or sloppy grammar.
We will be going over these blogs in class on Friday!
Friday, September 18, 2009
jack dowdell blog 5
The English language is a very difficult language to learn for many reasons. One of these reasons is the fact that many words and phrases have multiple meanings. For example, the phrase “ I heard that” literally conveys, that I physically heard the noise that was made or i understand the sentence that was just spoken to me. However, it also can express agreement to a statement recently made by another person. The English language is chock full of these double ended words and phrases.
Of all the doubles in the English language the word “Cougar” is by far my favorite. The Oxford English Dictionary defines the word cougar as a large feline quadruped, found wild in most parts of America: also called puma catamount etc. The forementioned definition of the word is its original intention. Hundreds of years ago some men came across a large cat and decided to call it as such.
As we have learned in this class though language is a constantly evolving and changing entity that will adapt to meet the needs of the world as it currently is. Because of this we now have a secondary meaning to the word cougar. Urban dictionary defines the word cougar as an older woman who frequents clubs in order to score a much younger man. This new definition of the word cougar is a pure reflection of changing times. The definitions are in no way related except for the word they define.
This brings up the question of which of these definitions is correct? Because there is technically no English standard truly we can not make that distinction. We can, however, examine the source of the knowledge and input in the definitions and through this make a stab at which one is more correct for usage in papers speeches etc.
The source of our first definition is the Oxford English Dictionary. For all intensive purposes this is the correct source for formal settings. It is a peer reviewed source meaning that it is reviewed and corrected by Professors as well as other academics and represents the traditions of the English language. This gives it credibility and makes it the place to find prescriptive definitions.
Urban Dictionary is the exact opposite of Oxford English Dictionary. It is a wiki style source in which the words are added by users as they appear in the lives of American youth. Because it is so new though it is highly unlikely you will find a definition accepted by the world of academia. This makes this a source of descriptive definitions because it is not qualified, but rather describes current situations.
These sources are a good reflection of the English language as it is today. A combination of both the old order preserving the integrity and tradition of the English language, as well as the youth of America making up new words to carry the language into the future.
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Righteous
Cougar
Cougar… Rrrrrrrr! This word may bring one of two images to your mind. Typically, the first thing that most people would instantly associate with cougar is the image of a courageous feline. In contrast, some people might correlate cougar with an aggressive, slightly older lady. (This definition will get more detailed as you read later.) Depending on which image came to mind, you are indiscreetly revealing your age or the generation you grew up during. Oxford English Dictionary Online defines cougar as “a large feline quadruped, found in most parts of America; also called puma, red tiger, American lion etc.” More enticing, one of my favorite definitions of many from the Urban Dictionary defines cougar as: (see also hunt, prowl, corner, pounce). Noun. A 35+ year old female who is on the "hunt" for a much younger, energetic, willing-to-do-anything male. The cougar can frequently be seen in a padded bra, cleavage exposed, propped up against a swanky bar in San Francisco (or other cities) waiting, watching, calculating; gearing up to sink her claws into an innocent young and strapping buck who happens to cross her path. "Man is cougar's number one prey.” There is obviously great distinction in these diverse definitions. One refers to and animal and the other is in reference to an older female. Such contradiction derives from the sources of authority behind each of these established definitions. Authority in the Oxford English Dictionary Online is prescriptive because their definitions are established by educated and qualified individuals to give a standard meaning to the word. It is typically used as a standard dictionary for a scholar. The Urban Dictionary is a descriptive authority because it is how we speak, the plain fact, and not a standard. This dictionary would be good for trying to define newer terms or slang words that have recently developed. Such a divergence in one definition is due to how the word’s use has changed over time. Younger generations would more likely associate with the second image of the word cougar because it is becoming increasingly popular to use the slang “cougar” to describe these older ladies. Although I am bias of the Urban Dictionary definition of “cougar”, I still believe that an Oxford English Dictionary definition would be more accurate because it is the typical definition of cougar. It is a dependable source. Urban Dictionary is an unreliable and inaccurate source for many words because it does not have a standard for who can establish the definition of a word. Therefore allowing anyone to have the capability to change a word based on what they think it is will vary drastically and be inconsistent among numerous amounts of people. This is why there were pages of definitions of “cougar” although many of them were similar everyone seemed to have their own different way of defining this word. A definition should be consistent and accurate.
english blog 5
The Oxford English Dictionary describes the term as being “The female of a dog” and “The term applied opprobriously to a woman; strictly, a lewd or sensual woman. Not now in decent use; but formerly common in literature. In modern use a malicious or treacherous woman; of things: something outstandingly difficult or unpleasant”. The Urban Dictionary contains similar meanings as well as some which are more painful to the ear. For example one entry describes bitch as “A woman that doesn't give a flying f*ck anymore and that can and will be cruel to men”. Another strong example is “An exceedingly whipped guy who does/wears/thinks/says whatever his girlfriend tells him what to do”.
The Oxford English Dictionary derives its authority prescriptively as it includes the mechanisms for establishing and maintaining an interregional language or a standardized spelling system. It also includes declarations of what particular groups consider to be good taste. The addition of new words to the dictionary can be a long process as each definition is painstakingly revised. This time consists of the contributions of several different people, and the work may in fact be spread out over a period of months, during which the entry is drafted, sent out for specialist consultation, and then returned for final editing.
The Urban Dictionary however derives its authority descriptively as it observes and records how language is used in practice. It also eschews value judgments and makes no recommendations unlike prescription. It is very much like Wikipedia as it allows anyone to add their own meanings to the website which as already shown, can result in graphic descriptions being added.
In conclusion I believe that it would be unfair to say either dictionary is better then the other. This is based on the fact that although the Oxford English Dictionary’s definitions are more ‘Standard English’ and politically correct than the Urban Dictionary, the latter’s definitions simply can’t be frowned upon. They may have some degree of graphicness in some of their definitions, but this only highlights the diversity of our language and how it is actually used in today’s world.
Gone
As a person hears the phrase “going once, going twice, gone!” at an auction, it is meaning that the option of purchasing the object for a higher price is going away quickly. A phrase a person may hear the night after a college party is, “that guy at the party last night was completely gone.” Gone in this sense is being completely drunk or high.
The Oxford English Dictionary defines gone as someone who has passed on or who is dead, not here anymore, or unavailable. The Urban Dictionary defines gone as something that is not here anymore, someone who is dead, and is also a word describing a person who is extremely drunk or extremely high. These two different sources which give similar but different definitions are both correct.
They are each correct depending on the text which a person chooses to use this word in. The authorities of the Oxford English Dictionary are scholars which choose to put this word into the dictionary. The authorities of the Urban Dictionary are just random people who have different meanings and different ways they can use the word “gone”.
The Urban Dictionary and the Oxford English Dictionary are both considered a prescriptive authority because they are telling the reader how the word is used.
What a Cock
Sick
There is now two additional to the original use of "sick". The common and older version was defined as a person who was suffering from illness. The slang is used to describe something that impresses you or is new, crazy, or daring. Also, it could be describing something bad, as in a prank that was overly rude or crude. This may be identified by a phrase such as, "That joke about her was completely sick." This word could also replace the word cool when referring to an act or material that attracts attention in a good way. An example of this may be, "That trick on his dirt bike was sick." This may be said after a group of people witnessed a new stunt.
The Urban Dictionary is the more modern reference between the two, the other being the Oxford English Dictionary. The Urban Dictionary has the ability to be updated by anyone, as a result it has the most recently updated information. Also, more crude slangs are offered on the Urban Dictionary than the OED, which allows for words to have more interpretations. The usefulness of both sources are limited according to what word is being searched and for what type of definition is being desired. They are both great sources; however, the Urban Dictionary is more geared toward slang and the OED is focused on serious definitions.
Dope
The first term that comes to my mind when thinking of something that would have a definition in both the Oxford English Dictionary and Urban Dictionary is the word “dope.” In recent times, dope has become a popular word to use to describe the drug heroin, or for those who don’t know what they’re talking about, to reference marijuana. The authorities of the definition for each dictionary change, as do the definitions.
In the Oxford English Dictionary, the definition for dope is 1. a. Any thick liquid or semi-fluid used as an article of food, or as a lubricant. U.S. This is a prescriptive definition, being that the authorities from the OED lay out rules for their definitions, based on what they think is “right and wrong.” This is a very classic definition for the word dope, and can be referenced as far back as 1876. The authorities of this definition have many degrees in English and devote their lives to deciding definitions of words.
On Urban Dictionary, the definition of the word dope is a little bit different. My favorite definition for the slang is “heroin, not crack, not powder, but heroin. not marijuana, not meth. but heroin. heroin is the only thing that dope could ever be. people who don't know what dope is are people with very sheltered lives.” This shows that Urban Dictionary’s authorities are just about anyone who wants to post a definition. They’re all very much opinionated, and often quite humorous. There is no “right or wrong” like in the Oxford English Dictionary, but rather pretty much any definition can be posted.
In my opinion, the Oxford English Dictionary and Urban Dictionary are useful for different words. If I wanted just a standard definition for a word, I would use the authorities of the Oxford English Dictionary. However, for any newer phrases or slang words, Urban Dictionary would give me the most diversity and choices for words. As can be seen, dope when used in modern speech is a better word to look up on Urban Dictionary than in the Oxford English Dictionary.
OED vs. UD
Comparing Authorities: OED vs. UD
Dr. Hughes
Everyday our society comes up with more and more words. Sometimes these words are stolen from the past and given a new meaning or created to fit something that has just been invented. Most of these new words or meanings can usually be somewhat insulting. Faggot, for example, is a word that has much controversy. This word has the power to be very demeaning and rude. With the word, faggot, one can see how over time society changed a words meaning to something totally different.
The Oxford English Dictionary gives several meaning for the word faggot. Some of these definitions include “A bundle of sticks, twigs, or small branches of trees bound together and the practice of burning heretics alive.” It even includes the slang definition which we are more familiar with, “a (male) homosexual.” People, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, have been using this word to refer to male homosexuals since around 1941. Even though this word has two different meanings, society tends to use the more discriminatory definition in everyday vocabulary. Urban dictionary is a little more contemporary in the fact that anyone can post a new word or a new definition that they themselves created. For this reason I find this website to be less credible then the Oxford English Dictionary. However, Urban Dictionary did contain both definitions for the word faggot.
There are always going to be some new words that magically appear out of nowhere. Words such as google, blog, and email were not even thought about in the 1950s, but they have become common, household names. Urban Dictionary and the Oxford English Dictionary can both be extremely helpful resources. However, I believe that the Oxford English Dictionary would be more helpful when looking up words for a paper or school projects. This dictionary is what I would consider to be prescriptive due to the fact that authorities do check over the content to make sure it is correct. On Urban Dictionary, anyone is free to write what they feel a word means and after reading some of their definitions you realize not all of them are correct. This is why I believe it to be a descriptive resource. Not to put Urban Dictionary down because I have used it myself and found it to be very informative, but it probably is not the most reliable source of information.
The Mack Daddy...
active to or sexually successful with women." Their definition then goes on to say that the term "mac daddy", has been in use since the nineteen sixties. The word shows up in the 1964 publication of the book "Deep Down in Jungle II." The Urban Dictionary depicts the word or phrase "mac daddy" to have the same meaning; but, the term is further described in a more "slang" and lamens terms way. The Urban Dictionary definition consists of "[t]he pimp-meister, the king of the streetwalkers, possessor of the blingest of bling-bling. The mac daddy is the man who means everything (and the only man who really means anything) to his ladies of the night." Therfore, the Urban dictionary appeals to the younger generation of slang users, rather than the proper and more seemingly "politically correct" terms in the Oxford English Dictionary. The Urban Dictionary conforms to the definitions its contributors. These contributors happen to be the people who use the terms, but who are not elected officials or anyone whith a higher ranking language appeal. The definitions of these two dictionaries carry the same word and somewhat the same definitions. However, The Urban Dictionary will appeal more to all readers because of it's almost "humor filled" definitions, contributed by those who know the words the best.